I'm going to be honest here: This movie hit my limit in terms of appropriateness. It is not something I would recommend to just anyone. I hesitate to recommend it at all, but there was one redeeming quality that made me feel like it was worthwhile for me as an individual. Two words: Henry Nobley.
The basic plot of Austenland is as follows: Jane Hayes has been in love with Jane Austen (and Mr. Darcy) since she was a child. After a run-in with her really slimy ex-boyfriend, she decides to do something that only characters in chick flicks can do: spend her savings on the trip of a lifetime. Jane heads to Austenland, an insanely expensive resort where women go and pretend to be characters in Jane Austen's world -- complete with romance. Hired actors keep the guests' experience… "lively". Jane is staying with quite the cast of characters, be they paid actors or paying customers. Long story short, Jane finds herself falling for the groundskeeper, Martin, instead of the actor she thinks she's being set up with, the gallant, eye-rolling, utterly Darcy-like Henry Nobley. [SPOILER ALERT] There's tension, awkwardness, historical inaccuracies galore, and then, PLOT TWIST! Lame-o groundskeeper guy is an actor who has been assigned to woo Jane, whereas Nobley is a history professor who has been roped into playing a character by his aunt, who owns the place. Henry really is in love with Jane, and as they both are terrible actors, every moment they shared was real. He's in love, flies across the pond to profess his love (and have tea), and they agree to give it ago. Did I mention that when he's not wearing a cravat he's sporting a thoroughly handsome blazer/sweater/button-down combo that makes his eyes look super blue and gives him an air of educated -- I digress.
 |
| He drinks out of a tea cup for the pure nostalgia of it. Hawt shtuff. |
The thing about
Austenland is that it has nothing to do with the real world of Jane Austen at
all. The rich patrons (unlike Jane) experience the highest luxury -- not
exactly the experience of Austen's landed gentry. Moreover, Jane Austen did NOT
(contrary to popular belief) write romances. The sensuous affairs of
Austenland's residents resemble penny dreadfuls rather than classic literature.
Austenland is like Mansfield Park in many ways, in terms of plot and themes. It
looks good on the outside, but it's morally corrupt on the inside. This moral
decadence leads in to what I don't like about this movie -- more on that later
-- but now, for the movie's redeeming quality, Henry Nobley.
Besides the fact
that JJ Feilds has the best facial expressions, Henry is more than just the
"good guy" of the movie. Henry and Jane both love the Regency era on
account of its social customs, which are all but non-existent today. The little
gestures like standing when a woman entered the room or limiting physical touch
to dancing were meant to protect love and
promote respect. Perhaps Henry and Jane are a bit idealistic in this regard,
thinking that Regency England was some sort of romanticized haven, but the fact they have ideals is extremely admirable. Meanwhile in Austenland, the hideous and over-sexualized modern culture
mingles with Jane Austen stereotype to create a pink, frothy concoction Henry
calls "grotesque". The prevalence of sexual sin at Austenland
directly conflicts with Henry's values and belief in proper conduct. Hence the
tension between Martin and Henry. Martin acts entitled to Jane's affections,
and takes liberties when it comes to physical contact and playing with her
emotions. Henry, meanwhile, is respectful in his touch and his conversation.
Henry, in his plain and historically accurate costume, stands as a literal and
figurative contrast to his counterparts. Also, he has the most endearing ears.
 |
| Dat chivalry, though. |
Now unto all that I
didn't like. Unlike Greek tragedy, in Austenland, all the not-so-nice stuff
happens on-screen. There were a number of "scenes" that made me
uncomfortable and I didn't appreciate most of the humor. I also find it
disturbing how flippantly the movie deals with a case of attempted sexual
assault. While the scene itself isn't graphic or overly disturbing, none
of the characters seem to take the occurance seriously. It is implied that such a thing
has happened before at Austenland and has been covered up on numerous
occasions. Yet Jane reduces the incident to blackmail and threatens to make a
case and sue the owner. The notion is dropped by the movie's end with minimal
fanfare. The offender is seen free -- albeit unhappy -- in a scene during the
credits. While all of this immorality played into the larger themes of the
movie, I don't think I can justify the tactless way it was presented. The cases of immorality were not dealt with
tastefully but rather treated as crude objects of humor. I wish I could wholeheartedly
recommend this movie, but alas... I hesitate. Perhaps one could watch it with Clearplay... though I'm not certain there would be a whole lot left.
On a semi-related
note…
My favorite Henry
moment was after the play (for there is indeed a play, a la Mansfield Park)
when he asked if he might reserve Jane's first two dances at the ball. This was
the Regency equivalent of saving the last dance, and I very much appreciated
the detail.
 |
| He calls people ninjas. |
Images: one, two, three
